Reservists and Israel’s Military Strategy by Pat Harrington

Israel’s military strategy has long depended on the mobilization of reservists. This system, deeply embedded in the fabric of Israeli society, has been a cornerstone of the country’s defense policy. However, in recent years, this reliance has begun to show cracks. Issues such as the inclusion of previously exempt ultra-Orthodox Jews, the psychological and economic toll of continuous conflicts, and a decline in reservist turnout have raised serious questions about the sustainability of this model.

The Backbone of Israeli Defense

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is unique in its reliance on reservists. While mandatory military service ensures a steady stream of trained soldiers, it is the reservists who form the backbone of the country’s operational capacity during conflicts. This model has historically allowed Israel to maintain a relatively small standing army while ensuring readiness for large-scale mobilizations.

However, this system relies heavily on societal cohesion and a shared sense of duty. The increasingly frequent calls to arms due to ongoing conflicts, such as operations in Gaza, tensions in the West Bank, and regional threats from Hezbollah and Iran, are testing the limits of this cohesion.

The Challenge of Ultra-Orthodox Integration

One of the most contentious issues has been the attempt to integrate ultra-Orthodox Jews (Haredim) into the military framework. Historically, Haredim have been exempt from military service due to their religious studies. Efforts to change this—driven by both the need for manpower and societal pressure for equality—have faced significant resistance.

The inclusion of ultra-Orthodox reservists poses practical and ideological challenges. Many Haredim lack the basic military training provided during mandatory service, which complicates their integration into operational units. Additionally, their religious commitments often conflict with the demands of military life, leading to tensions within mixed units.

Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot highlighted this issue, stating, “The integration of the ultra-Orthodox into the military is not just a manpower issue; it’s about bridging significant cultural and societal divides.” Despite government initiatives and incentives, progress remains slow, and the controversy continues to polarize Israeli society.

The Toll of Never-Ending Wars

Israel’s geopolitical reality has subjected its citizens to a near-constant state of conflict. This burden falls heavily on reservists, who are often called away from their families and jobs for extended periods. The psychological toll is immense, with many reservists experiencing burnout, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Economically, frequent call-ups disrupt careers and place additional strain on employers, particularly in small businesses. While the government provides some compensation, it often falls short of covering the full impact. The cumulative effect of these challenges is a decline in reservist turnout, with some refusing to report for duty altogether.

Recent figures reveal that as many as 20% of reservists did not report for duty in 2023, a sharp increase compared to previous years. This trend has alarmed military officials and highlights the growing disconnect between the IDF and its reservist force. “We’re seeing an erosion of the social contract that underpins the reservist system,” said a senior IDF officer in an interview with Haaretz. “If this continues, it could fundamentally undermine our military readiness.”

Low Casualties and Future Risks

So far, Israeli casualties in these conflicts have remained relatively low, with an estimated 100 fatalities among IDF personnel in 2023. This has helped to sustain public support for military operations and mitigate the impact on reservists. However, military analysts warn that an increase in casualties could profoundly affect Israel’s social fabric and its reservist system.

Higher casualty rates would likely exacerbate the psychological toll on reservists and their families, further diminishing turnout. It could also lead to greater public scrutiny of military policies and increased opposition to prolonged conflicts. Political analyst Ehud Yaari observed, “The Israeli public has a high tolerance for sacrifice when there is a clear purpose. Without a defined endgame, a spike in casualties could erode both morale and trust in leadership.”

The prospect of greater losses also raises concerns about recruitment and retention within the IDF. Younger generations, already questioning the value of their contributions in seemingly endless wars, may become increasingly reluctant to serve as reservists.

The Lack of a Clear Exit Plan

Adding to the strain is the absence of any clear exit strategy for the conflicts in which Israel finds itself embroiled. From Gaza to the West Bank, the perception of endless wars with no resolution in sight has begun to weigh heavily on Israeli society. This lack of a long-term plan not only demoralizes soldiers and reservists but also fosters a sense of futility among the broader population.

Political analyst Ehud Yaari noted, “The absence of a coherent strategy to end these conflicts undermines public confidence in the government and military leadership. People are beginning to question the purpose of their sacrifices.” This growing disillusionment is reflected in the declining willingness of reservists to participate, as many feel their efforts are perpetuating a cycle with no end.

A Critical Opinion on Long-Term Viability

The reliance on reservists is becoming increasingly unsustainable in its current form. The integration of ultra-Orthodox Jews, while politically expedient, risks alienating both secular and religious communities. Without significant reforms to address the economic and psychological toll, as well as a clear strategy for reducing the frequency of conflicts, the IDF’s dependence on reservists may falter.

Furthermore, the broader societal implications cannot be ignored. A system that relies so heavily on citizen-soldiers requires a strong sense of unity and shared purpose. As Israel becomes more polarized—politically, religiously, and socioeconomically—the foundations of this system are at risk.

In the words of Amos Yadlin, former head of Israeli Military Intelligence, “The strength of the IDF has always been its connection to the people. If that connection weakens, so too does our national security.”

Please donate £10 to the work of Third Way here